DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2490
EGA
Docket No: 85
20
-14
af
Ta eece ee ee
22a vUalualy
BE? Bo
Tob
i
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 21
July 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised
+n our letter of 17 November 2011, that your application had
been denied.
your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the letter you submitted, even
though not previously considered by the Board, was imnsuriterent
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 4
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequent
naval recor
existence
ROBERT k
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 17 November 2011, that your application had been denied. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the jetter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7271 14
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 24 January 2011 that your application had been denied. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though net previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03222-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10589 14
Orr THE WAVY F Ee : CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE CORDS uu INGTON, VA 22204-2420 JSR Docket No: NR10589-14 4 Decemper 2014 Dear Colonel ee * : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section L552 » You requested % that the fitness report for 7 December 2009 to 21 July 2010 be modified by removing the entire section K (reviewing officer’s (RO’S) marks and comments) . New evidence is evidence not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR660 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, your request was denied and the BCD was subsequently approved at all levels of review, and on 30 January 1976, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06513-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 19 March 1969 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of disobedience and disrespect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00042-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TAL Docket No: 042-10 12 October 2010 ee. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. @pnsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8657 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by 2 Enree- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5506 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 28 April and 23 September 2014, copies of which are attached, and your letter dated 8 May 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1647 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...